7 Questions For: Author Stephanie Barden

Stephanie Barden is the author of Cinderella Smith. 

Click here to read my review. 

Here is an excerpt from the bio on her webpage:

My first book, Cinderella Smith, comes out in April 2011. A second book, Cinderella Smith and the More the Merrier, will come out in 2012. A third Cinderella book, as yet untitled, will follow in 2013.

I love writing, letting my story swallow me up and take me where it will, but it can be lonely. So I’ve found it’s important to surround myself with good friends. My desk is in the kitchen which forces my family to wander past occasionally and my dog, Otis, always lies right by my feet. I also have two crows that hang out outside my window every day, keeping one eye on me and one eye on their food, (dry dog food).

Besides writing, I spend a lot of time being a mom and a little time teaching classes at Woodland Park Zoo in Seattle. That’s where I live, by the way, along with Joe, Otis, those two crows I mentioned and my husband, Tom. I’ve spent most of my life here, other than five years in Northern California, and love it most of the time. Except when the wintery part of autumn arrives and it’s cold and dark and wet and I know I have at least four more months like this ahead of me. The good news is, the weather inspires me to stay inside at my computer, writing away and feeling sorry for those two crows outside eating dog food.

And now Stephanie Barden faces the 7 Questions:



Question Seven: What are your top three favorite books?
 
I have six favorite books – I tried to cull it down to three to answer this question, but I just can’t. They are: Go Dog Go, Charlotte’s Web, From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, To Kill a Mockingbird, In the Land of Dreamy Dreams and The Doubtful Guest.
 
 
Question Six: How much time do you spend each week writing? Reading?
 
In my dreams I’d like to spend 4 hours day writing and at least an hour a day reading -- so maybe 24 and 10 a week? Right now I’m trying to navigate promoting my first book and it’s taking way too much time away from the pleasures of writing and reading.
 
 

Question Five: What was the path that led you to publication?

 
I first got the itch to write when my son was young and we spent hours together reading and making up stories. When he started school I started taking writing classes. The older he got, the more serious I got. I joined SCBWI and started attending conferences. Three years ago I finally felt like I had something worth sharing. I queried 20 agents, got 18 rejections, one maybe and one yes. My agent, (first Craig Virden then Marietta Zacker, both of the Nancy Gallt Literary Agency), helped me polish up the manuscript and sent it off to potential publishers. Two were interested and I chose to work with Barbara Lalicki at HarperCollins. She works with Beverly Cleary, one of my idols, so I knew I'd be in good hands with her.
 
 
Question Four: Do you believe writers are born, taught or both? Which was true for you?
 
I think we’re both born and taught – at least that’s the way it was for me. You have to enjoy the creative process and understand the nuts and bolts. You also have to persevere – stay at your desk, type away, ignore the sun and the garden – at least sometimes!
 
 
Question Three: What is your favorite thing about writing? What is your least favorite thing?
 
My favorite thing about writing is losing myself in my story and being surprised by my characters. My least favorite thing is trying to promote my book. Maybe that’s because I don’t really understand how to do it yet – maybe I’ll like it better when I know what I’m doing.
 
 
Question Two: What one bit of wisdom would you impart to an aspiring writer? (feel free to include as many other bits of wisdom as you like)

Karen Cushman said the following in an interview and I printed it up and taped it to my computer:

1. Show up – make a commitment to write.

2. Pay attention – stuff yourself with honest experiences.

3. Tell the truth – based on your own beliefs and passions.

4. Let go of the outcome – publication is only one reason to write.


Question One: If you could have lunch with any writer, living or dead, who would it be? Why?

Oh gosh, (see answer number one.). I think I’d like to have a luncheon with P.D. Eastman, E.B. White, E.L. Konigsburg, Harper Lee, Ellen Gilchrist and Edward Gorey. I have drug their books around for years – through college dorms, first apartments and several homes. They each have a prominent place on my book shelf as well as in my heart.

www.stephaniebarden.com

Book of the Week: CINDERELLA SMITH by Stephanie Barden

Meet Josephine-Kathryn Smith, better known as Cinderella Smith due to her habit of continually loosing at least one shoe everywhere she goes. She’s funny, she’s quirky, and you’re going to love her. She’s a Bridget Jones for the grade school crowd. Actually, I can’t back that up. You see, Esteemed Reader, Cinderella Smith is a girl book (the chapter titles are types of shoes), and the ninja is forever a boy. If I had seen The Devil Wears Prada, I would probably compare it to that. But I will say that this is a book my sister would have loved and even though I’m a Transformer kid trying to play with a My Little Pony today, I’m going to do my best to tell you why Cinderella Smith is a great read, despite its unfortunate case of cooties.

By the way, Cinderella Smith is the first book by Stephanie Barden, who will be here on Thursday to face the 7 Questions (assuming she doesn’t take offense that I said her book has cooties). And while I’m plugging, I might also remind you to check back on Saturday when we’ll have a surprise literary agent drop by to face the 7 Questions.

Girls are mean, dude. Even as a little boy, I thought this, and my knowledge of little girls hasn’t increased much since then. Consider Cinderella Smith’s “friends,” the two Rosemary’s. They seem to feel they’ve outgrown Cinderella because they have pierced ears and Cinderella does not. They exclude her from their table at lunch (harsh). If you’re thinking those two Rosemary’s sound a bit like wicked stepsisters, you’re on the right track.

Fortunately for Cinderella, there’s a new girl at school to be sat with and the two become friends. Her name’s Erin and she is about to get two for real stepsisters and she needs advice on how to determine if they’re wicked or not and who better to ask than someone named Cinderella? Cinderella doesn’t have any experience with stepsisters, but she has seen a lot of episodes of It’s Me or the Dog and read Dear Abby. Cinderella and Erin start a notebook of evidence about the two stepsisters so that Erin will know what to expect when she meets them for the first time.

The friendship between Cinderella and Erin is one of my favorite things about this book. It feels natural and genuine and I completely bought it, but as I’ve mentioned, I have little experience in these matters. One of the great moments in the book comes when Erin and Cinderella are having a play date at Erin’s house and find several things about Erin that belong in their wicked stepsister evidence log. Could it be that the new stepsisters have as much to fear from Erin as she does from them? It’s perhaps not the dramatic revelation of Charlton Heston discovering that the Planet of the Apes (spoiler) is really earth, but it’s a mature thought and the girls arrive at it in a way that does not feel forced and which comes organically from the story.

So what happens when Erin finally meets her new stepsisters? Are they wicked or what? Esteemed Reader, you know I would never spoil that for you. You’ll have to read Cinderella Smith to find out, and I recommend that you do. You’re going to have a good time and you’re going to laugh because parts of this book are very funny.

And that’s my review, but I have three bits about craft. One, if you’re thinking of weaving a classic fairytale into your modern story, read Cinderella Smith. But please don’t weave the classic tale of Little Red Riding Hood into your vampire/werewolf/zombie/evil mermaid tale as we already have stacks of those (actually, the evil mermaid thing sounds promising).

Readers will pick up on all of the elements in the classic Cinderella story in Cinderella Smith, but Barden doesn’t let them dictate the plot. There’s a big ball, disguised as a fall dance recital, and a bit about a lost shoe, and even a boy named Charlie Prince (how clever is that). But this isn’t a retread of Cinderella and that’s a smart move on Barden’s part. After all, if we want Cinderella, there’s a Disney version with talking mice and that’s going to be tough to top, although I always preferred Roald Dahl’s version in Revolting Rhymes. Cinderella Smith is a wholly original tale that uses the Cinderella motif more for laughs than anything else.

Two, Barden makes a seemingly odd decision in casting Cinderella Smith as the protagonist. After all, her friend Erin is the one who is getting the stepsisters, Erin is the one whose mother is getting married, and it’s Erin’s mother’s wedding that makes for the climax of the third act. Isn’t this Erin’s story? Well, yes and no. Cinderella has a plot of her own, but it’s closely tied to the events in Erin’s life.

The fact that the crux of the novel, the welcoming of new stepsisters, isn’t happening to our protagonist tells us something about her and creates a unique character. Cinderella Smith needs a friend now that the Rosemary’s have abandoned her and how intimately she involves herself in Erin’s affairs shows us the lengths she’s willing to go to for friendship. And besides that, Cinderella Smith is such a strong character with such a strong voice, it would be impossible to mistake anyone else for the main character.

This brings me straight to point number three, which is that Cinderella Smith has a unique voice created through careful craftsmanship by Barden, and as this story is written in the first person, Cinderella’s voice is the novel’s voice. Cinderella is a spunky character who records her pithy observations in a diary of sorts, so maybe that Bridget Jones comparison isn’t completely off base. Nah, I’ll just let it go. But consider this excerpt from the novel’s opening chapter:

When we were very little, we called each other Tinder and Tarles because we couldn’t say each other’s name just right. As soon as I could, I started calling him Charlie, but he kept on calling me Tinder because he knows it embarrasses me, and this is why. Back when I was calling him Tarles, I had, for some dumb reason, a crush on him. In this instance I am allowed to use the word dumb because it’s about me and because it really was dumb. I used to walk over to his house every morning and ask him if he thought I looked pretty. If he said yes, I went back home and had breakfast. If he said no, I went home, changed my clothes, and tried again. And that is embarrassing stuff with a capital E.

It’s awfully revealing about who Cinderella Smith is at the same time important exposition is being delivered. Now contrast that passage with this excerpt from a few chapters later in which Cinderella is feeling a bit bummed because, as I mentioned before, girls are mean:

Usually I would have loved to hear all about it, but my insides were hurting like the dickens, so much that I couldn’t pay attention. The lunchroom was noisy, but even though I was in the middle of a super crowded table and super crowded room, I felt alone. I chewed and tried to swallow and blink-blink-blinked my eyes. There was no way I was going to cry right then and there. No way with a capital N.

I don’t have a lot to say about these passages, except to point out the recurring motif with a capital ‘M’ (or ‘R’). Cinderella also uses the expression “like the dickens,” and a number of other expressions throughout the work, so that the language she uses to describe every situation is uniquely her own and could not be anyone else’s.

More, all of Cinderella’s observations are tempered by who she is. In all thoughts, she takes into account what her parents think or have told her, which is completely appropriate for her age and situation. This is the world through the eyes of Cinderella Smith and if you struggle with voice the way I sometimes do, Esteemed Reader, here is a book for you to read. Or if you write voice perfectly (lucky) and you’re just looking for a good story well told, here is a book for you to read.

And that’s going to do it. Be sure to come back Thursday when Stephanie Barden will be here to face the 7 Questions and again on Saturday when we’ll have a new literary agent interview. And now, as always, I’ll leave you with some of my favorite passages from Cinderella Smith:


“What can you tell me about your wicked stepsisters?”
“Not much,” she said. “I haven’t met them yet.”
“Why not?” I asked.
“I’m not going to meet them until right before the wedding.”
“That sounds a little fishy.”
“It does?” she asked.
“Yes,” I said. “Maybe your stepfather is very, extremely ashamed of them.”

She reached her hand right out the window, and I gave it a good shake, with a good grip, like my dad showed me. Nobody likes a limp-noodle hand.


“This isn’t rain,” I said. “This is dribbly-spit.”
“Dribbly-spit?”
“That’s what we call it at my house,” I said. “I’m not sure what the scientific name is.”


“…My tap shoe is missing.”
My mom’s eyebrow kept going up.
“But, but, but,” I said, trying to make her eyebrow go down again. “Erin and I are going to make posters all about it today and hang them all over the block.”
Her eyebrow stayed half up and half down.
“We already checked all through the Lost and Found and I made an announcement and Mrs. Bentley says we can hang posters at school. Also, I searched all over the house and I told Miss Akiyama and I searched all over the dance studio too.”
I looked at my mom, but I couldn’t tell which way her eyebrow was going.


STANDARD DISCLAIMER: Book of the Week is simply the best book I happened to read in a given week. There are likely other books as good or better that I just didn’t happen to read that week. Also, all reviews here will be written to highlight a book’s positive qualities. It is my policy that if I don’t have something nice to say online, I won’t say anything at all (usually). I’ll leave you to discover the negative qualities of each week’s book on your own.